The concert is a photo of photographic activity complex that it would be difficult to summarize in one article, however, we attempt here to give you the basics and some tips to make your own path. The most complex thing here is to manage well on light, it will influence on hardware, speed, placement, framing, ... here we will see through the different sections.
The camera: Reflex silver, SLR, compact camera.
In the picture together using a compact camera has is not recommended, the increased sensitivity (iso) of the latter is not done without damage, their sensor is smaller, the noise will be very present on the x .
The reflex that allows changing of optical functions of each position will allow you to always have the right hardware to suit your subject.
Optics: fixed focus, zoom, wide open!
Pictured together we seek above all the most luminous optical potential that is to say, those that offer the largest aperture (characterized by the lowest number on the lens).
In digital we must take into account that the sensor size influence on the size of the lens: a 50mm 1.8 will become an interesting 80 mm 1.8
These lenses are also the most expensive, we can separate them into two groups:
The fixed focal lengths:
Have goals that generally offer the best quality - price ratio, in fact, a 50 mm which has a maximum aperture of 1.8 is around 150 euros. The advantages are: the price, weight, openness generally high.Zooms, "A zoom is a zoom lens: an extra ring can change the focus of an ongoing, changing along with the magnification of the image but not the prospect of shooting. The zoom is technically an objective with multiple lens groups, some of which are mobile, which allows to vary the focal length between two extreme values. The numerical ratio between the longest and shortest focal length is called "amplitude" or "power" of the zoom. For example, a 35-105 mm zoom is "3 × zoom." The zoom advantageously replaces a series of fixed focal length lenses. The rapidly increasing capabilities of zoom, ranges from 28 to 70 mm (wide angle to normal) and 70 to 200 mm being the most common. The f/3.5 maximum aperture rarely exceeds for the first and f/4.5 for the latter. But there are professional versions at f/2.8. "For the photo source wikipedia concert zooms that have a constant aperture is 2.8 are strongly recommended to address the lack of light.
 |  |  |
D70 Nikon matrix metering, speed 1/100 28mm focal length, aperture 2.8 iso: 200 | Nikon D70 spot metering, speed 1/80 50mm focal length, aperture 1.8 iso: 640 | D70 Nikon matrix metering, speed 1/60 90mm focal length, aperture 2.8 iso: 200 |
The flash: a proscribed
The flash in most concert is prohibited, its use eliminates all light effects that are part of the service. Use in remote or slow sync is potentially feasible as discussed in the section of William Gaessler has dedicated the photo flash and wide angle.
Sensitivity: sensitivity = silver grain in digital noise =
If you worked in the ISO 800 film are perfect. There are other more sensitive film (1000, 1600, 3200). The higher you go in isos over the photo will be provided with grain that is quite beautiful in silver and contributes to the interest of the photo.
If you are in this fine digital grain transforms into noise seen in soup pixel, which is much less attractive, we recommend that you stay within the values below 600 isos (the noise is treated differently on digital SLR cameras, market the Canon 5D SLR is one of the best manager digital noise).
Speed: not under the same focal see a little more digital
A general rule of speed is not to go below the size of the lens for a 50mm one does not go down below 1/50, seen for the digital conversion factor which "transforms" a 50mm in 80mm we will not fall below 1/80 to avoid camera shake by the photographer.
This is of course a general rule, assuming that you handheld shooting without a tripod, optical or stabilized housing. We must separate the photographer's camera shake and blurring of moving subjects.
For luting against blurring from camera shake of the case there are several methods:
The tripod: The tripod allows you to stabilize the housing up, but you live a lot in handicap go.
Monopod: monopod as the name suggests is a tripod has a foot .... It does of course not the same stability, but allows you more freedom in your travels, it is highly advisable to train to use a monopod before using it in such events
Stabilized lenses and housings: They can gain some valuable speed and thus fall isos.
Note that these are the only methods to reduce camera shake by the photographer, can be perfectly stable performer or group will not be his always. The blur of the subject may be interesting to give an impression of movement speed.
The metering: Center-weighted, spot and matrix
 |
Nikon D70 spot metering, speed 1/200 focal length 200mm, aperture 2.8 isos: 1400 |
There are three types of metering: Center-weighted, spot and matrix. Although these determinations are variable depending on the hardware, the result remains the same.
The matrix metering: this allows control of light on the entire image. It is recommended to use it as often as possible and for all types of shooting landscapes, architecture, close-up portraits.
The center-weighted metering: it focuses about 15% of the image (center), while spot metering is concentrated on less than 8% (always in the center).
These measures are almost mandatory in photo together, because usually artists are highlighted with respect to the scene itself, working with spot metering on the face of the singer the unit will handle the torque speed / diaphragm a way to correctly expose the face of the singer regardless of the back of the stage is photographically is probably not very interesting (cables, boxes, pipes etc ...)
Device mode: aperture priority?, Shutter priority?, Manual?
 |
D70 Nikon matrix metering, speed 1/250 90mm focal length, aperture 2.8 iso: 200 |
For me the only aperture priority and manual mode with an interest: We put on the full aperture of the lens, its speed is monitored so as not to fall below the size of the focal length (to prevent blurring from camera shake) and one part is triggered.
Most of digital cameras: Most digital SLR cameras have a feature that auto iso is very convenient for the picture together, because if the conditions do not stay in decent speeds was wide open, switches the mode isos and goes on to manual, you set its opening to the greatest possible openness, we chose its speed, it switches to spot metering and the device itself decides isos depending on light conditions.
RAW or Jpeg?
Volker Gilbert wrote a very good book on the raw will speak better than me so I quote :
"The RAW (or rather exist as RAW a good package) represents the raw information collected by the sensor at the time of the shooting. The sensor is colorblind-blooded and only receives information brightness usually analyzed using the Bayer array, equipped with RGB color filters. Obviously this raw file requires sophisticated processing to image presentable. And there you have two options:
Trust the DSP processor in your camera that converts the raw file as a JPEG or TIFF (rarer) by applying the passage all the settings you previously selected (white balance, saturation, tone curve, color space , sharpness, etc..).
Perfect, you're finally in possession (try to palpate a file, it's hard) to a file ready to use. Happiness? Yes, if you have your perfectly controlled shooting, white balance made with onions and set your file with impeccable precision. I never knew come close to perfection in the JPEG shooting up. This is despite the use of traditional techniques (light meter and thermocolorimètre), used to conquer my fears facing new technology.
The use of JPEG involves knowing what you will make your image. Offset printing, Internet publication, photo printing in Minilab, each use requires very specific parameters of development and you can not know in advance whether such and such a picture will not be used in a context different from that originally envisaged.
But beyond the constraints for the choice of parameters, do you know that the JPEG or TIFF file is a simplified interpretation, minus your captured file? You took care to cram the 4096 shades per channel (12 bits = the usual depth of a digital SLR) to find yourself with 256 levels (8 bits = JPEG or TFF produced by your camera) to the arrival? Well, it's stupid not to choose what you throw in passing ... "
Minimize noise at the shooting: exposing the right
Work in concert to 100 isos even under exposing is pretty much an illusion, most concerts are limits in terms of light.
The first reaction to reduce noise and increase the shutter speed would deliberately underexpose the photo shoot to "meet" then the brightness with photoshop.
In digital "face" image even at 100 iso, do not PIXILATED, but the rise in noise is impressive, the film development is more flexible for this kind of exercise.
In a digital sensor the bulk of the dynamics is to the right of the curve in the highlights, which is why I recommend (and I'm not the only) to expose the Areas cramées (right) to have as much material located on the right side of the histogram, which then allows to play and contrast while reducing the noise greatly.
A sunny picture right (that is to say as close as possible burnt area) has 800 isos will produce less noise than a underexposed photo has 200 isos raised in photoshop.
Different types of concerts by Sebastien Lebacq : accreditation, places, pictures of examples:
 |
EOS 20d, Canon 17-40 f4 L, 1/400eme, spot metering, ISO 3200, -2/3IL Sebastien Lebacq |
Major concerts such Johnny, U2, Red Hot are certainly spectacular, but without accreditation, take pictures quickly becomes a job for Tom Cruise, not to mention that the cameras are often prohibited entry.
On the other hand, very intimate concerts given in small rooms can be really in the mood, almost all the public is less than 5 meters from the artist, but the lighting is often much less right. But then in these rooms, cameras are often welcome, both from the manager of the box and on the part of the artist. The latter gladly accepts the pictures (without flash generally), and it is sometimes possible to offer the pictures (I did concert mudflow, Belgian rock band ... they were thrilled to receive the photos, that they immediately posted on their website).
 |
Housing EOS 20d Lens: Sigma 70-200 f2, 8 1/60th at f2, 8, in the expo from 2/3 EV ISO 800, matrix metering Sebastien Lebacq |
Example: these pictures were taken during concert for groups known enough people who are interested in this style of music, but in a small concert hall in Verviers (Belgium), Spirit of 66 (which has a capacity of approximately 300 seats).
Pain of Salvation concert at Spirit of 66: Grace to the case, one can use the 800 iso without much trouble, provided to restate a little later with the photo software to eliminate much noise.
To maintain sufficient speed, iso and more, the large aperture of the lens is a major asset.
Being under expose by 2/3 IL avoids burn out too much of the picture but also to gain in shutter speed.
Photographed together, for a photograph that stands out a bit, it is also important to calculate the timing is triggered to capture an expression or a particular situation.
The 50mm is an excellent view for photography together, because it has a very open and an amazing dive, not counting its ridiculously low price and small footprint.
Here in this photo of Popa Chubby concert, Spirit of 66 I decided to ensure the CDP by choosing an f4 aperture, and compensating for greater sensitivity (ISO 1600).
 |
EOS 20d, 50mm f1, 8, matrix metering, iso 1600, -1 / 3 EV, f4, 1/60th second Sebastien Lebacq |
 |
Housing EOS 20d Lens: Sigma 70-200 f2, 8 1/125eme to f2, 8, in the expo from 2/3 EV ISO 800, matrix metering Sebastien Lebacq |
The flash photo concert by William Gaessler : Wide and slow sync
 |
Canon EOS 300D 18-55 William Gaessler |
Unlike photographers with whom I could discuss, I work 99% of the time with flash.
It sagit by cons, concert or the use of flash is not a problem for the artist or group, I am fan of music called "saturated" (metal, hardcore ..), the rooms where j ' attend these concerts are mostly small bars, clubs, usually quite dark, a little scene.
The Caravan Serail which houses a majority of hardcore concerts in Toulouse, is in general to local groups on average 30 entries, up to 250 for a strange group "best known".
The maximum capacity of this room should not exceed 130 persons for a minimum of space between each respectable member of the public, as saying that for "big dates" we soon learn to make sardines.
What you should know well in this kind of concert is that the public is generally "boiling hot", rather young, most are there to sweat in the hardcore, there is a "dance style" which is called KDS (Karate Dancing Style), you can imagine, so be very careful with his equipment, the feet that fly overhead are not uncommon.
 |
Canon EOS 300D 18-55 William Gaessler |
I recently started using a digital SLR Canon EOS 300D, my technique is to shoot in slow sync flash, which allows me to have the artist correctly exposed and frozen (with flash) and to have his movements and games light through the long pause on the device (between 1/15s and 1s in general).
I'm usually pretty close to the artist (18mm focal length) which I find gives an impression of movement even stronger on the picture.
I plan to soon buy a wide zoom lens (Sigma 10-20mm) for its sharpness and focus ring that has nothing to do with the canon of EF-s 18/55 mm (because I do not use not autofocus, light is generally much too low and changing too fast for the autofocus).
May 12th, 2006 at 11:50
top
May 17th, 2006 at 5:08
Thank you, nice tutorials as
May 17th, 2006 at 10:43
Very nice tutorial like!
May 17th, 2006 at 11:17
Excellent tutorial!
May 17th, 2006 at 11:52
Very nice this idea of shooting tutorials concert .. gave some light on some of
my little escarpades technical ... when the last 3 photos .. really superb!
May 18th, 2006 at 1:10
Superb! A huge thank you! I've learned to shoot my second concert
May 19th, 2006 at 4:10
From AP to pass without setting the D70 since one week I lost all my bearings ...
Your tutorial, very educational hands me afloat
Remains that the practice
Thank you a thousand times
@ +
Lab
June 4th, 2006 at 3:24
[...] Article on the picture together has also been updated with the participation of William Gaessler which works almost exclusively with flash Radius hardware, I finally decided, the D200 is controlled, and after the vendor delivering the supplier is based on the tide ... it remains for me to burn a candle for me to receive the beast fast enough. [...]
June 23rd, 2006 at 24:20
Good good all photos ...
AS you tested the nikon d50 for concert photos?
@ +
June 23rd, 2006 at 3:10
no, but I think that will be very different, the same sensor, has focused on the side of the optics that will manage
August 3rd, 2006 at 9:07
That's a great job that will allow everything to everyone to remember some basics!
Congratulations for this idea
Olive
August 4th, 2006 at 11:13
Great! I will use it well, thank you.
August 27th, 2006 at 12:21
Small useless question for those like me who started recently in RAW but at the white balance, manual or tungsten?
Thank you
A +
August 27th, 2006 at 24:25
In automatic saw that the light conditions are constantly changing and the raw bdb is after the photo
September 18th, 2006 at 11:10
Hello,
Excellent tutorial for my part if I have to use the flash, it was in slow mode, and red eyes on my D50 it gives very good result
October 3rd, 2006 at 3:42
Hi Ben, congratulations on your site, your photo and full of lessons this tutorial! good luck
October 17th, 2006 at 24:03
Thank you very much for all these tips very useful!
October 17th, 2006 at 4:27
if you had to recommend one perfectly suited for digital concerts which conseillerez you?
October 17th, 2006 at 7:27
A canon 5D even though I'm not a fan of the case it must be admitted that the noise level management is very efficient
November 22nd, 2006 at 24:19
SUper this tutorial!
November 26th, 2006 at 5:38
Great, all this good music sprinkled with ... (mudflow, but happiness ...)
Cheers
February 10th, 2007 at 8:56
[...] Source of this technique from the site of Benjamin BROLET [...]
February 17th, 2007 at 8:40
I just read your article and I must say I was starting a little touch to photography, I thought AC would have been easier but I like it that AC does not in fact ... I learned a lot reading you especially for the material to be used in concert because I did a lot and its usually my pictures too dark (I work with a Canon 350D and I have no goal that the 18-55 and 70-200 4.0) Now if I have understand I have to save for another target of 50 with a more open ...
In fact if you have the opportunity to take my msn for a bit more and m refer to answer lots of questions would be really nice ca ...
And m to go before I want to congratulate you for your time my photos are superb
February 17th, 2007 at 3:17
Hi Buck,
Yes to the concert it takes light, a good compromise to start with is a 50mm 1.8, it is easily in Cygnus of around 100 euros and offer my opinion on meillieur value for money.
To answer all your questions there is a very nice bunch of forums including this one
http://forum.hardware.fr/hfr/Photonumerique/liste_sujet-1.htm
Benjamin
February 19th, 2007 at 1:44
I'll give you a famous secret for shooting concert if you do not have high goals fixed aperture.
Under-expose: it will work even -3 & low iso (50-100).
Result speedup and thus sharpness, as low sensitivity, it suffices to note the brightness without encountering bad photoshop pixellisations and you're led smoothly!
See ya!
LeCed.
February 19th, 2007 at 2:02
Hi Ced,
I do not agree with your comment, and I would rather partisant overexpose a photograph exposed in a 100 isos will be much more noisy than a well exposed picture has 800 isos.
An article quite interesting Volker Gilbert talks about the right exposure in RAW
Work in concert to 100 isos even under exposing is pretty much an illusion, most concerts are limits in terms of light, I already tried to work this way at the beginning and the result is quite désastrueux (histogram comb abérations chromatic noise very present)
In digital "face" image even at 100 iso, do not PIXILATED, but the rise in noise is impressive, the film developement is more flexible for this kind of exercise.
In a digital sensor the bulk of the dynamics is the right of the curve, which is why I recommend to expose the Areas cramées order to have as much material located on the right side of the histogram, this which then allows to play and contrast the exhibition thereby greatly aténuer noise.
Working in RAW (16bit) for these photos is mandatory for me to maintain maximum detail and modeled.
A photo on the right has a good exposure for me isos 800 will produce less noise than a camera underexposed has raised 200 isos in photoshop. We're talking about a print or an image 100%.
Box photoshop in this kind of event I prefer to avoid a maximum, when you come back from a concert and you have to deliver images, go through 200 photos exposed for editing in Photoshop, I prefer to avoid.
On the net someone had shown this method of lifting and lower isos with photoshop and exhibit strong against high isos, the results speak for themselves.
I'll watch it tonight to find this comparison, in the meantime if you have images to illustrate your method does not hesitate.
June 3rd, 2007 at 24:01
[...] A few technical references: Photography on Wikipedia Portal Photography - Theory and practice technique on Wikipedia the photo together with "photob.be" [...]
June 3rd, 2007 at 12:06
It's nice to share little secrets
I tried to exercise on my blog ( http://www.alaingrodard.fr/blog/2007/06/03/tutorial-techniques-pour-la-photo-de-concert/ )
and I allowed myself to linker this page ...
June 5th, 2007 at 11:58
Alain thank you, I took the opportunity to rework my text and add sections
June 6th, 2007 at 2:46
Between us we will do the best tutorial in the world
June 30th, 2007 at 12:03
July 26th, 2007 at 2:48
I'm an amateur photos of concerts, I do it intensively for 3 years or less. Bravo for photos and advice, I would also say it is interresting to take a peek into the audience from time to time, it allows pictures of nice atmosphere (crowd surfing, circle pit ...)
July 30th, 2007 at 8:32
Mitch, Thanks for your comment sorry for the answer to the flock, I am as amateur as you
and the public is actually something that I forget who is actually very interesting
Thank you for your post
August 3rd, 2007 at 24:08
Great tutorial! Thank you so much to offer all these things. Personally, I practice in concert last year (with learning by doing as they say) and I started to develop some techniques to improve my images. I could, too, try some musical events "neo-mad" (those in which gravity is no longer de rigueur). I find it interesting to talk about it here
! As I am still a novice, I was able to enjoy all these generous information! If you want to take a look at the assoc 'with which I work:
http://www.lillelanuit.com
Thank you again for this great job!
March 5th, 2008 at 4:12
[...] To neophytes. For more information, I recommend the excellent article by Benjamin BROLET on its website http://www.photob.be . It reads information on the type of device and [...]
April 27th, 2008 at 11:46
Thank you very much, very much for your great tutorial!!
I tried to follow your advice during the festival Zik'n trolls Ménéac (Britain) this weekend because I had never made pictures with my D80
I put quelqu'unes at the following address:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/24903591 @ N05/2443878478 /
Congratulations again, we want more ....
May 7th, 2008 at 2:50
Thank you for your passage Benjamin, I have long guêtais an opportunity to put a link to your article oh so interesting (mouarf, sucking up the ball!).
The list is indeed full of assholes, I'll include those happy motivating you to stick to the stage and film with their compact, while the pictures and videos are strictly prohibited as specified in the entry, you have fought for nearly three weeks to get your accreditation hyper limited, and the asshole in question only had to hide in his breast pocket compact. Sad.
May 14th, 2008 at 11:35
thank you for the advice, I started to crack as nothing to do with the film, and live my d80 I wanted to throw it, going to practice it, thank you again
May 28th, 2008 at 9:05
thank you for this tutorial very explicit
So if I understand it is better exposed to the right
I have a naive question: if you underexpose by 2/3 steps as in the photo of Concert Pain of Salvation you bring exposure to the left of the histogram is not it? this is not contradictory with the first board?
anyway thank you for all of the above
June 28th, 2008 at 12:16
Ha, Sebastien Lebacq knowledge ... yet!
September 4th, 2008 at 9:55
Good evening Ben,
in preparation for a shoot tomorrow, I rescanned this article very comprehensive and very useful (thanks!). One thing remains unclear to me blowing out to right.
I understand the value under more generous (outside during the day for example) but here is beyond me.
Let me explain with an example: imagine my 50mm at its maximum opening of 1.8, Av mode, ISO 400 and speed needed to properly expose: 1/30 ie very limited.
According to what I read, ideally to overexpose one or two notches, to have more material, the digital is more efficient in the highlights. Ultimately less noise.
Only if I want to keep the same speed I will have to increase the ISO, then add to the noise!
What's the point of overexposure in such conditions?
Thank you!
October 18th, 2008 at 7:51
[...] Advice and method. I started in show photos have been greatly influenced by ICI. (Non-commercial pages, although [...]
November 6th, 2008 at 1:42
[...] Account (not responsive enough). In documenting a little before I go there, I was reading this: photob.be | Benjamin BROLET | Photographer Brussels »Photo concert Excellent website, very didactic, if you has never been to a [.. .]
November 25th, 2008 at 3:36
Good morning.
For starters, thank you for this tutorial.
I just spent in digital (Canon 450d), better late than never, and I've never used pro photo editing software (at least not yet) ...
A few weeks ago, while I had my digital box in the last few days I have been photographing friends in concert.
So I chose the easy method tungsten, iso 1600, 75/300 (max length: 4) and shutter priority 1/160 with Burst option to nab the right light and expressions and (shame on me after reading these explanations ), jpeg output format). (Of course without flash, it goes without saying!)
I did not know the scene.
I go back in a month and I worry a little because I'm far from mastering this case (my bp has a silver cell therefore, for all that is manual, I hassle ...).
The photos I took are all clear but some are more than good, others often lack ch'touille light or are outright black and blue (they love the blue and magenta in this room )
You talk about exposure to the right (so if I have everything before on my box, this is a correction of the white ...).
Objective level, I just found a 85 mm 1.8. of occas.
I therefore consider this show (without the question of the exhibition because I hope someone will tell me if I understood correctly or not), as follows:
- Priority focus to the max with speed 1/125 regardless of the purpose (I take my 85 and my 75/300)
- Iso 800 for the noise in some photos did not really top.
- Naturally: RAW output format!
You have suggestions / corrections to offer me?
Let me know!
Merci d'avance et désolée de mettre à découvert mon ignorance sur certains points…
novembre 25th, 2008 at 3:39
Désolée, je viens de voir que j'ai fais un lapsus !
(…)l'exposition à droite (donc si j'ai bien tout saisi concernant mon boitier, c'est une correction du BLEU)(…).
février 8th, 2009 at 5:14
[...] recevoir mon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS. La technologie était de mon côté. Pour la technique, j'ai lu l'article dédié à la photo de concert, proposé par Benjamin Brolet (son ITW ici) sur son superbe [...]
mars 6th, 2009 at 1:39
[...] montée en ISO est nécessaire et l'ouverture maximale recommandé (Très bon tuto sur “la photo de concert” par Benjamin Brolet), n'étant équipé que d'un vieux 75-150mm f4.5 le [...]
mars 27th, 2009 at 1:30
Super interessant tous ces tutos techniques, merci
juin 22nd, 2009 at 1:57
C'est un très bon tuto. Je suis tout à fait d'accord avec tout ce que tu dis et c'est exactement ma façon de travailler. Ca me rassure! J'ai découvert ton site recémment et je trouve que tu fais un travail de très bonne qualité. +1 visiteur régulier!
juin 29th, 2009 at 2:13
Bravo!!!!!
décembre 23rd, 2009 at 11:48
Merci pour ce très bon article avec plein de conseils utiles ! Dommage que je ne sois pas tombé dessus plutôt…
février 2nd, 2010 at 4:36
Salut!!! J'aime beaucoup le fonctionnement du site et les différents articles etc… ce soir je vais faire des photos d'un concert sur Orléans et je ne connais pas les conditions dans lesquels je vais devoir réaliser le shooting! mais j'ai déjà réaliser des photo de spectacles sur scène de type danse! Les lumières sont plus intenses et mieux gérés! (Et j'étais en numérique!) Là je suis dans une petite salle et je prend mon Reflex Argentique! Donc je croise les doigts pour être réactif! j'ai pris note de vos conseilles et espère que ça me suffira! merci des infos!
mars 4th, 2010 at 1:46
Je n'ai pas totalement compris la partie:
“Minimiser le bruit a la prise de vue : exposer a droite” et l'histoire de sous exposition, car il est après marqué :
“Le fait de sous exposer de 2/3 IL permet d'éviter de cramer une trop grande partie de la photo mais aussi de gagner en vitesse d'obturation.”
On recommande donc d'abord de privilégié une poussé en iso au lieu de sous exposer, puis de sous-exposer tout de même?
Ou alors faut-il combiner les deux?
En l'attente de votre aide,
Regards
juillet 28th, 2010 at 3:11
[...] ? Et vous êtes plutôt raw ou jpeg ? Des articles à lire et relire. Raw ou jpeg chez Virus Photo La photo de concert par Benjamin Brolet. [!] Soumettre une idée, article ou bug. Processing your request, Please [...]
novembre 11th, 2010 at 3:13
[...] en ISO est nécessaire et l'ouverture maximale recommandé (Très bon tuto sur « la photo de concert » par Benjamin Brolet), n'étant équipé que d'un vieux 75-150mm f4.5 le [...]
décembre 17th, 2010 at 11:59
[...] http://www.photob.be/technique/la-photo-de-concert/ [...]
avril 23rd, 2011 at 4:11
Article très intéressant pour moi qui adore prendre des photos lors de mes concerts. Je vais donc essayer d'appliquer tous les conseils que je viens de découvrir.
juin 12th, 2011 at 7:32
[...] La photo de concert par Benjamin Brolet [...]
août 12th, 2011 at 1:38
Ah yes en effet, tuto' sympa ! Thanks, ça servira…
novembre 24th, 2011 at 11:10
Great! a very useful item. Je fonctionnait plus au feeling et au hasard avec des résultats mitigés. A suivre après essai. Je croise les doigts
décembre 26th, 2011 at 3:40
hello,
j'ai lu avec beaucoup d'intérêt cet article.
je cherche a me procurer un reflex numérique afin de faire de la photo de concerts et de la photo sous terre (en spéléo)
un conseil, une marque, un modèle a un prix abordable ?
thank you very much.